Article by TUV Leader to mark 10th anniversary of establishment of Belfast Agreement devolution
05 December 2009
The News Letter edited out some of the punch of the article, so here is the unedited version, with News Letter omissions highlighted:-
10 years on from our first taste of Belfast Agreement devolution some, who made careers and political advance out of denouncing the Good Friday deal, are now its chief operatives. The cover for their power hungry volte face is the deception that at
For all the marginal tinkering at
Mandatory coalition - designed to guarantee terrorists in government and preserved by denial of the basic democratic right of being able to vote a party out of office;
The Joint First Ministers Office – built on mutual veto which guarantees its dysfunctional failure;
The insidious cross-border bodies – designed to evolve the all-island agenda.
In 1998 Peter Robinson rightly said this:
“The
It should not be forgotten that the Belfast Agreement’s endorsement of the pan-Nationalist contention that it is “the
Each of the attempts at Belfast Agreement devolution has abjectly failed. If fell apart under David Trimble and it is again disintegrating before our eyes on the DUP’s watch. Far from delivering good government it has become a byword for lamentable failure and endless deadlock, with the chaos in education typifying its hopeless performance. There is not a more wretched failing government anywhere in
Mandatory coalition will never work. Its deviant concoction of mutual vetoes for mutually exclusive political ideologies is doomed to fail. Enforced by the outrageous denial of the right to vote a party out of office and the ban on an Opposition, it is the very antithesis of democracy. Those who pretend they will change it from within are indulging in deception on a par with their past pretence that they had in fact got rid of the Belfast Agreement. The same republican veto which blights mandatory coalition’s operation will equally block its removal.
Only the election of sufficient Unionists determined not to operate mandatory coalition will force the negotiations which will see its demise. Certainly voting for those who keep mandatory coalition going day and daily will never advance us towards democratic voluntary coalition. TUV in Stormont will be the catalyst for positive change.
If, which is not our desire, executive devolution cannot be set up on a satisfactory democratic basis, then the only option is to make Direct Rule more accountable and acceptable. We would work with the new Government to provide the maximum accountability in these circumstances and attempt to integrate